From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SETPGRP and autoconf Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:31:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010802143140.A9915@nevyn.them.org> References: <20010726084450.A2941@nevyn.them.org> <3B60505D.5080304@cygnus.com> <20010727102017.A5627@nevyn.them.org> <3B61CFB7.9080302@cygnus.com> <20010730150903.A32225@nevyn.them.org> <3B65E437.9020502@cygnus.com> <20010730155239.A3711@nevyn.them.org> <3B65E690.7060104@cygnus.com> <20010730155939.A4241@nevyn.them.org> <3B66D3F3.8010001@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00058.html On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:51:15AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Didn't previous e-mail conclude that for such a case setpgid() would be > >> used so there wasn't a problem? > > > > > > The results of the test are not important, but configure will fail to > > run at present. > > > Ah! In that case ... (yes, why not). OK, moved to the branch too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer