Re: [rfa] mips heuristic_proc_start fix

Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-07-06T11:32:00Z

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > This one was fun to track down... I've been getting corrupt PC values off
> > the stack in backtraces, something which needs to be fixed elsewhere. The
> > interesting thing is that the PC I was reading was 0x2. Remember that
> > CORE_ADDR on MIPS is an unsigned 64-bit quantity.
>
>
> You mean ***SIGNED** right?

Glarg. Yes, it's signed, of course! Let me peer at this for a moment
and see why the math was coming out wrong; the patch is correct, but
now it's not quite as obvious to me why :)