Re: Patch review process

Christopher Faylor
2001-06-13T13:14:00Z

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:02:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>
>>>The other one is a way of better tracking patches. At present, in the
>>>end, it is still me using my mailbox for manual processing.
>>
>>
>> Didn't we discuss tracking patches in the PR database at one point?
>
>
>It tripped up when testing revealed that you couldn't reliably extract a
>patch. I think it is also a hack, it lacks the tight integration that
>some other systems have.

We're using a new version of GNATS on sourceware these days. I don't
know if it is any better or not for extracting patches, though.

cgf