Re: Patch review process

Christopher Faylor
2001-06-13T14:49:00Z

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:14:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:02:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>>
>>>>The other one is a way of better tracking patches. At present, in the
>>>>end, it is still me using my mailbox for manual processing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Didn't we discuss tracking patches in the PR database at one point?
>>
>>
>>It tripped up when testing revealed that you couldn't reliably extract a
>>patch. I think it is also a hack, it lacks the tight integration that
>>some other systems have.
>
>We're using a new version of GNATS on sourceware these days. I don't
>know if it is any better or not for extracting patches, though.

Oops. Make that a new version of gnatsweb, not gnats.

cgf