From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch review process Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:14:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010613161437.B10980@redhat.com> References: <3B279F7E.4050405@cygnus.com> <20010613142900.A9723@redhat.com> <3B27C6B8.70205@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00265.html On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:02:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> >>>The other one is a way of better tracking patches. At present, in the >>>end, it is still me using my mailbox for manual processing. >> >> >> Didn't we discuss tracking patches in the PR database at one point? > > >It tripped up when testing revealed that you couldn't reliably extract a >patch. I think it is also a hack, it lacks the tight integration that >some other systems have. We're using a new version of GNATS on sourceware these days. I don't know if it is any better or not for extracting patches, though. cgf