From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [RFA] top Makefile.in: all-m4 depends on all-texinfo Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:21:00 -0000 Message-id: <200103201121.DAA26682@bosch.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00376.html This is a proposed change for the top Makefile.in. I don't know exactly where to send to this, but the top README says: Makefile.in; configure; configure.in Please notify the following of any committed patches. binutils@sources.redhat.com gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com The FSF tree does not have m4 source integrated into it yet, but I'm working on a tree that does. m4 has some texinfo documentation files, so all-m4 needs to depend on all-texinfo. This patch simply adds this dependency. Testing: I tested this with i686-pc-cygwin and i686-pc-gnu-linux on some trees that I have. Is it OK if I apply this? Michael Elizabeth Chastain "love without fear" === 2001-03-20 Michael Chastain * Makefile.in: all-m4 depends on all-texinfo. Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.30 diff -c -3 -p -r1.30 Makefile.in *** Makefile.in 2001/03/08 05:50:03 1.30 --- Makefile.in 2001/03/20 11:14:48 *************** configure-target-libchill: $(ALL_GCC_C) *** 1630,1636 **** all-target-libchill: configure-target-libchill all-target-libiberty configure-target-libobjc: $(ALL_GCC_C) all-target-libobjc: configure-target-libobjc all-target-libiberty ! all-m4: all-libiberty all-make: all-libiberty all-mmalloc: configure-target-newlib: $(ALL_GCC) --- 1630,1636 ---- all-target-libchill: configure-target-libchill all-target-libiberty configure-target-libobjc: $(ALL_GCC_C) all-target-libobjc: configure-target-libobjc all-target-libiberty ! all-m4: all-libiberty all-texinfo all-make: all-libiberty all-mmalloc: configure-target-newlib: $(ALL_GCC)