From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
To: chastain@cygnus.com, msnyder@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/derivation.exp: use 'runto' library function
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:17:00 -0000
Message-id: <200103122017.MAA01686@bosch.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00172.html

Michael Snyder writes:

> Maybe we should add one, somewhere (if not in this file), 
> so that that bug cannot slip thru the cracks?

There's an explicit test in gdb.c++/method.exp that matches this
bug pretty well.

  send_gdb "continue\n"
  gdb_expect {
     -re "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint \[0-9\]*, A::foo \\(this=$hex, arg=13\\) at .*method\\.cc:38\r\n38\[\t \]*x \\+= arg;\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
	pass "continued and got breakpoint in A::foo"
     }
     -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "continuing and breaking in A::foo" }
     timeout { fail "(timeout) continue" }
  }

gdb.log says:

  continue^M
  Continuing.^M
  ^M
  Breakpoint 2, A::foo(int) (this=0xbffff390, arg=13) at /vittone/fsf/2001-03-09/source/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/method.cc:38^M
  38        x += arg;^M
  (gdb) FAIL: gdb.c++/method.exp: continuing and breaking in A::foo

I'll add a note to PR gdb/34 that it's tested in gdb.c++/method.exp.

Do you want me to add a note to gdb.c++/method.exp that it tests PR gdb/34?

Michael