From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Option to elide single-bit bitfields when printing structures
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 00:13:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010227001242.G27567@wolery.stanford.edu>
References: <20010224130533.D13956@wolery.stanford.edu> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010225095140.10629M-100000@is>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00474.html

On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 09:52:11AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:05:16AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > > 
> > > I don't think this feature is necessary.  This is just an
> > > instance of special display of data.  This is what the 
> > > gdb scripting language is for.
> > 
> > Is it, then, possible to write a gdb macro which can display an
> > arbitrary structure type in this fashion?  As far as I know, I would
> > have to write individual macros for each structure I wanted to see
> > specially.
> 
> How many such structures are there in the GCC sources?

At least 20.

zw