From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup i386-tdep.c
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:34:00 -0000
Message-id: <200102182034.PAA21395@indy.delorie.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010218081910.4804E-100000@is> <200102181017.f1IAHmd11648@delius.kettenis.local>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00345.html

> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:17:48 +0100
> From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
> 
> Please create i386-nat.c (and i386-nat.h, for the exported
> interfaces).

Is it okay to use preprocessor symbols, like i386-tdep.c does, to get
the watchpoint code included only in those x86 ports which support
this kind of watchpoints?  I mean, i386-nat.c, once created, will
probably be added to NATDEPFILES of every native x86 platform, right?
However, some of them might not support watchpoints through debug
registers (I think Solaris doesn't).