From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
To: chastain@cygnus.com, msnyder@redhat.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@cygnus.com, keiths@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:48:00 -0000
Message-id: <200102161748.JAA00551@bosch.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00298.html

Hi Michael,

> No, the check is not useful.  "call foo(10)" has nothing
> to do with malloc.

We've been through this.

How do you know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc"?
What is the source of your knowledge?

I know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc" because:

  . I inspected the code
  . I ran callfwmall.exp and it PASSed that test.

> Um -- Michael, did you get those two mixed up?

No.

Michael