From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
To: chastain@cygnus.com, jimb@cygnus.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, fnasser@cygnus.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, keiths@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:55:00 -0000
Message-id: <200102161655.IAA23895@bosch.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00290.html

Hi Jim,

> So the real disagreement is whether this is a valuable thing to test
> for.  Since I cannot imagine any reasonable inferior function
> invocation mechanism that would rely on the existence of malloc, I
> think it's as useless to test for that as to test for, say, the
> ability of GDB to handle functions named `t_structs_i' (which
> callfwmall also tests for us!).

Ah, yeah, now we are talking about the same thing, just disagreeing.
Which is how I hope to leave it.

Michael