Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-15T09:00:00Z

> I don't get it. malloc is not used at all when the argument is not a
> string. So, what malloc() being available or not has to do with this
> situation?

The point is that use case #3 should keep working, even if
someone changes gdb.

Suppose I check in a patch tomorrow to allocate the call dummy in malloc'd
memory instead of the target's stack.

Would that be a problem?
If it is a problem, what test case can catch it?

Michael