Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Keith Seitz
2001-02-14T13:12:00Z

> Fernando Nasser wrote:
> >
> > Sounds reasonable. Check it in (assuming you have already added yourself to the write after approval list).
>
> Hold on -- aren't you defeating the purpose of this test?
> The test was added by HP precisely because these calls
> fail when malloc isn't included in the target program.
> The test is a duplicate of callfuncs.exp, except that it
> doesn't link malloc.

So the purpose of the test is to FAIL? What's the passing criteria?

Keith