Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-15T08:30:00Z

Hi Fernando,

> Both Kevin and I are now proposing a minimal test for #4

Oops, I missed that in my recapitulation. Yes, you are.

To be correct, that test should accept either "$1 = 3" or
"error: evalation ... requires ... "malloc"".

> (#3 does not depend on malloc() so it is already tested in callfuncs).

No. Look at use case #3:

Use case #3:

. malloc is not available
. the user types: call abs(-10)
. gdb expected response: "$1 = 10"

callfuncs.c contains an explicit call to malloc. Therefore, callfuncs.exp
does not check use case #3. It checks use case #1.

Michael