Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Fernando Nasser
2001-02-15T12:48:00Z

Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> > And if he/she is a really good maintainer he/she will reject your patch
> > as it would be adding a restriction to inferior function calls that we
> > do not currently have.
>
> This is bothering me.
>
> I've seen some real "this is so embarrassing I should wear a brown
> paper bag over my head" bugs:
>
> (gdb) set input-radix 2
> Input radix now set to decimal 4294967295, hex ffffffff, octal 37777777777.
>
> Sorry if I make the author of that bug blush. My point is that this
> happens in software, and that it's the job of the test suite to detect
> when it happens.
>

I don't see a relation to what we were discussing.

And I think this thread is too long for such a small thing.
I have better things to do.

If this test file stays it will stay in its abbreviated form.

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9