Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-16T09:48:00Z

Hi Michael,

> No, the check is not useful. "call foo(10)" has nothing
> to do with malloc.

We've been through this.

How do you know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc"?
What is the source of your knowledge?

I know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc" because:

. I inspected the code
. I ran callfwmall.exp and it PASSed that test.

> Um -- Michael, did you get those two mixed up?

No.

Michael