From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Fernando Nasser , GDB Patches Subject: Re: Write after approval additions Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 04:24:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010214072421.A3608@redhat.com> References: <3A817ED7.60A7B32C@cygnus.com> <3A81AC7D.22AC2232@cygnus.com> <3A8986A4.783810A6@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00204.html Hi - cagney wrote: : [...] : Once someones name is in the MAINTAINERS file the people giving approval : can be sure of the above all hold. Significantly, they can be sure that : the person has a valid assignment. : : To turn the question around, how to BFD maintainers know if someone : submitting a patch has a valid GDB assignment in place? But that's a separate issue! Vetting a patch based on whether the contributor has a filed copyright assignment occurs before the patch is approved. The MAINTAINERS file does not list all people with assignments. - FChE -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6inj1VZbdDOm/ZT0RAsgUAJ9bWl6ci5rT0PECgtikwm+EdCMeeACfR1t5 vClLhvypau8xkf9AiaKnf3I= =9NzN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >From cgf@redhat.com Wed Feb 14 06:53:00 2001 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] sources.redhat.com -> sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:53:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010214095356.I16327@redhat.com> References: <200102132300.SAA17489@panix2.panix.com> <3A89C50B.48405663@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00205.html Content-length: 615 On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 06:36:43PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >jkingdon@engr.sgi.com wrote: >> >> At first I was going to call this an "obvious fix" as described in >> MAINTAINERS, but in case I'm wrong, any objections? >> >> 2001-02-13 Jim Kingdon >> >> * CONTRIBUTE, README, TODO: sourceware.cygnus.com -> >> sources.redhat.com. The nice thing about company names is that >> there are so many to choose from (don't get me started on logos :-)). > >I don't see any real point in the patch. Why not just leave it until >gdb.gnu.org is in place. Ditto. cgf