From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii To: dima@Chg.RU Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Patch to gdb.texinfo Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 00:59:00 -0000 Message-id: <200003130859.DAA25938@indy.delorie.com> References: <200003121611.TAA45044@netserv1.chg.ru> X-SW-Source: 2000-03/msg00221.html > Please apply this patch to gdb.texinfo (revision 1.1.1.14). > This fixes several typos and markup inconsistences. Thanks! A few comments: > @kindex quit @r{[}@var{expression}@r{]} > @kindex q > @item quit > +@item quit @r{[}@var{expression}@r{]} This should be @itemx, not @item (since this is in a @table). Or did you intend to remove "@item quit"? > -String constants are a sequence of character constants surrounded > -by double quotes (@code{"}). > +String constants are a sequence of character constants (without > +single quotes) surrounded by double quotes (@code{"}). I think "without single quotes" is ambiguous. I suggest "not including single quote characters @samp{'}" instead. I also suggest to use @samp, not @code here. A bare @code is IMHO not suitable for character constants, as it lacks the delimiting quotes. > -For complicated cases, you can specify an arbitrary number of @r{-T}@var{section} @var{address} > +For complicated cases, you can specify an arbitrary number of @samp{@r{-T}@var{section} @var{address}} I don't see the rationale for this change. Could you please explain? >From dima@Chg.RU Mon Mar 13 01:06:00 2000 From: Dmitry Sivachenko To: eliz@is.elta.co.il Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Patch to gdb.texinfo Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 01:06:00 -0000 Message-id: <200003130906.MAA63437@netserv1.chg.ru> References: <200003121611.TAA45044@netserv1.chg.ru> <200003130859.DAA25938@indy.delorie.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-03/msg00222.html Content-length: 1170 > @kindex quit @r{[}@var{expression}@r{]} > @kindex q > @item quit > +@item quit @r{[}@var{expression}@r{]} This should be @itemx, not @item (since this is in a @table). Or did you intend to remove "@item quit"? Yes, you are right. It's my typo. > -String constants are a sequence of character constants surrounded > -by double quotes (@code{"}). > +String constants are a sequence of character constants (without > +single quotes) surrounded by double quotes (@code{"}). I think "without single quotes" is ambiguous. I suggest "not including single quote characters @samp{'}" instead. I also suggest to use @samp, not @code here. A bare @code is IMHO not suitable for character constants, as it lacks the delimiting quotes. I agree. > -For complicated cases, you can specify an arbitrary number of @r{-T}@var{section} @var{address} > +For complicated cases, you can specify an arbitrary number of @samp{@r{-T}@var{section} @var{address}} I don't see the rationale for this change. Could you please explain? Look at the printable copy. Single quotes around `-Tsection address' looks better. --dima