From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13230 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2017 17:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12257 invoked by uid 89); 23 Feb 2017 17:20:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=flew, H*f:sk:38210a5, H*f:sk:1485451, 21166 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:20:55 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1cgx4X-0003k2-HF from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:20:53 -0800 Received: from [172.30.12.171] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:20:46 -0800 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests References: <1485451129-16439-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com> <38210a5e-14b5-23f6-456c-1ec1b900caf5@redhat.com> <8660k0c1w2.fsf@gmail.com> To: Yao Qi CC: Pedro Alves , From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <1faa8163-95cf-06be-3c39-b9c936820335@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8660k0c1w2.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.202) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00641.txt.bz2 On 02/23/2017 10:23 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > Luis Machado writes: > >> Here's the updated version of the tests patch. > > Hi Luis, > This test fails on x86_64-linux, reported in PR 21166. Could you take > a look? This test contributes to 500 fails in gdb.sum. > Sure. That flew under my radar.