From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5396 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2019 01:47:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5381 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2019 01:47:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 01:47:56 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A35221E05A; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 21:47:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Remove Cell Broadband Engine debugging support To: Ulrich Weigand , Tom Tromey , eliz@gnu.org Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20190919174941.A0037D80287@oc3748833570.ibm.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <1f8e7325-4ad5-7709-40e4-c576e52e819e@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 01:47:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190919174941.A0037D80287@oc3748833570.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 On 2019-09-19 1:49 p.m., Ulrich Weigand wrote: > I just noticed that the MAINTAINERS entry is obsolete, then. > In some cases, we've simply removed those when removing a target, > but in others they were marked "Deleted". What should we do here? Personally, I don't think it's particularly useful to keep these deleted entries in the maintainers file. For documentation and information purposes, we could have a list of architectures that GDB supports right now and has supported in the past (maybe we already have that in the doc?), but the maintainers file doesn't seem appropriate for this. Simon