From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113178 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2016 21:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 113168 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jun 2016 21:03:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:319 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:02:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A46080084; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u5EL2u1B006187; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:02:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix implicit conversion warning produced by clang To: John Baldwin , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1465926942-37759-1-git-send-email-ttsugrii@fb.com> <4098693.y3tFsLmOox@ralph.baldwin.cx> Cc: Taras Tsugrii From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <1f8a56ba-c6a8-44ad-fcf8-97e7fa419a8a@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4098693.y3tFsLmOox@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 On 06/14/2016 08:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > Some of clang's warnings are a bit noisy though and I haven't tried > to address the -Wunused-function spam from VEC() For the VEC spam, see: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22712 Thanks, Pedro Alves