From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80152 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2018 03:17:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 78153 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2018 03:17:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=explains X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 03:17:01 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C00D91E186; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 23:16:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1537067819; bh=Ne7r8NaLSuD18FEkwmny+k8OwOp9PM0hWHLDa5Kx6Tk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=RWTMXXDrlnoIri/vZPpESL+F5cxflaaiui+Jbbsvm4oXEP+tVmYUxVCAxJ96oF8pf lJpHxyJWmD6SoUTDnWS3LgGjxwfNG5y9Rx8dN6+uCSkz1SSLAgnW5kV4yQuZZAbYdn 0pEXS5RDXvLVjHe3xc9PnZdA1RSrvmcOxkWcVLwo= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Use GNU style for metasyntactic variables in gdb To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180915025522.18723-1-tom@tromey.com> <20180915025522.18723-3-tom@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <1f40ea99-e324-eb58-9049-4063f0204bc9@simark.ca> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 03:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180915025522.18723-3-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2 On 2018-09-14 10:55 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote: > I searched for other spots that did not use the GNU style for > metasyntactic syntactic variables. This patch fixes most of the ones > I found in gdb proper. There are a few remaining in MI, but I was > unsure whether those should be touched. LGTM. Out of curiosity, is there a place in the GNU coding standard that explicitly explains this? Simon