From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51400 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 19:35:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51379 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 19:35:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:35:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1883B70D; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9CJZeIJ009173; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:35:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add support for choosing disassembler cpu in GDB for POWER. To: Peter Bergner References: <20160930161908.6A43511C24D@oc8523832656.ibm.com> <20161003222527.GO4877@bubble.grove.modra.org> <5a66aca9-dfe9-7c44-21f9-27774a07d143@vnet.ibm.com> <91e1cf79-06d8-0eff-a1a0-5665563f0054@vnet.ibm.com> <98f7c932-3347-a07c-5282-ca83cbb89593@redhat.com> <8bfd2bd6-c2b3-cf5e-c689-897b877970f1@vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alan Modra , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <1e8b09d0-5a4f-402f-f684-b9eb0fc383ca@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8bfd2bd6-c2b3-cf5e-c689-897b877970f1@vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On 10/11/2016 07:48 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: >> > > I'm fine going with whatever option name people prefer. If you want > "disassembler-options" instead of just "disassembler", ok, but shouldn't > ARM be renamed then as well if it uses this mechanism? I think so. That wouldn't break anyone's scripts, since "disassembler" is an unambiguous prefix of "disassembler-options", and thus gdb would still accept "disassembler". Thanks, Pedro Alves