From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FA4E385BF81 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 21:49:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1FA4E385BF81 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2CAD1E792; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:49:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDB 10 branching - 2020-06-27 Update To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Tom Tromey References: <20200627154005.GA5618@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <1e871f06-d788-49c1-6185-18ac2b977908@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:49:54 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200627154005.GA5618@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 21:49:56 -0000 On 2020-06-27 11:40 a.m., Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Great progress last week, as the first section of this report will > indicate! So far, we're down to 3 identified issues we would like > to fix before branching. As always, if you see anything else that > you think should make the list, please let us know! > > As a reminder, the proposal was to try to branch during the weekend > of July 4th if we can, which is very soon. From there, we would then > aim for a release 2-3 weeks later. > > Fixed Since the Previous Update: > -------------------------------- > > * [RainerO/PedroA] > [10 regression] run fails with ICE on Solaris > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25939 > > * [AndrewB/TomT] > QEMU / GDB compatibility on RISCV64 ELF (failure to fetch some registers) > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169393.html > > Reference to the patch series that got pushed a couple of days ago: > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169561.html > Subject: RISC-V target description and register handling fixes > > * [PhilippeW] > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25475 > > * [PhilippeW] > Allow the user to define default args for aliases > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169467.html > > Added Since the Last Update: > ---------------------------- > > * [Unassigned (reported by LuisM)] > Regression on testsuite due to changes to default_target_compile > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26175 > > Patch causes some options to be missing when compiling test code. > > * [AndrewB] > Fix Python unwinders and inline frames > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169789.html > > Difficult issue to solve. Andrew mentioned he would appreciate > feedback from others who might be familiar with this area > (inline frames hanlding). Andrew provided in his commit revlog > a very detailed explanation of the situation. > > Other Ongoing Items: > -------------------- > > * [TomT/HannesD] > Mismatching fstat() function calls in gdb_bfd_open() and cache_bstat() > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25302 > > Latest discussion at: > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169670.html > > Not Critical, but Requested: > ---------------------------- > > > > -- > Joel > Hi Joel, I stumbled on a bug introduced by the multi-target patch, which I think should be a blocker for the release (not necessarily the branching). I marked it with target milestone 10.1 in bugzilla: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26199 Simon