From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55898 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2016 16:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 55870 invoked by uid 89); 24 Nov 2016 16:36:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=dropped, utils.c, UD:utils.c, utilsc X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:36:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6836D64F8; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn03.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.3]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAOGa362022434; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:36:03 -0500 Subject: Re: New ARI warning Thu Nov 24 01:57:17 UTC 2016 To: John Baldwin , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20161124015717.GA16844@sourceware.org> <2343714.57bNQKpj40@ralph.baldwin.cx> Cc: GDB Administrator From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <1e035f32-7c10-bbd8-85ec-56b001abfe9a@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2343714.57bNQKpj40@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00767.txt.bz2 On 11/24/2016 02:48 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, November 24, 2016 01:57:18 AM GDB Administrator wrote: >> 679a679 >>> gdb/utils.c:1878: code: no parameter function: Function having no parameter should be declared with funcname (void). >> gdb/utils.c:1878:get_prompt_for_continue_wait_time () > > Should this ARI check be dropped since this is normal C++? Yes. Thanks, Pedro Alves