From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130025 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2017 14:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130008 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jan 2017 14:58:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:f1c19cc X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:58:25 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1cTrgt-0001QP-U4 from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 06:58:23 -0800 Received: from [172.30.8.199] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 06:58:20 -0800 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Don't throw exception in dis_asm_memory_error References: <1484051178-16013-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <1484560977-8693-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <1484560977-8693-7-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <20170118145415.GN28060@E107787-LIN> To: Yao Qi CC: From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <1cd511fb-31b0-230b-d220-de9f0bb73fe0@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170118145415.GN28060@E107787-LIN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 On 01/18/2017 08:54 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 17-01-17 08:42:24, Luis Machado wrote: >>> + gdb_test_internal "disassemble 0x0,+4" \ >>> + "Cannot access memory at address 0x0" >> >> I think you missed the comment you had proposed? >> > > Sorry. > >> # GDB can't access any memory because there is no live inferior. >> >> I take it we have no loaded executable as well? Otherwise we could >> eventually read data from the executable file, which wouldn't yield >> an error. > > How about this? > > # GDB can't access memory because there is no loaded executable > # nor live inferior. > Looks good to me.