From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 91250 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2018 15:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 91232 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jul 2018 15:16:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:16:34 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w6BFGSSG011732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:16:32 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E50101E76F; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:16:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ABA1E059; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:16:27 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:16:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 0/5] remove some infrun-related cleanups In-Reply-To: <8d58e254-3507-90fa-ff2c-f0a07d187543@redhat.com> References: <20180711141552.10136-1-tom@tromey.com> <8d58e254-3507-90fa-ff2c-f0a07d187543@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1b3ae44c17acd581cb2ed1c782b375c6@polymtl.ca> X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 On 2018-07-11 10:54, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 07/11/2018 03:15 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >> This series removes some cleanups from infrun. >> >> Tested by the buildbot. > > OK. > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves Small obvious suggestion of making save_infcall_suspend_state and save_infcall_control_state return unique pointers. Simon