From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27819-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6222 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2003 20:34:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6212 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 20:34:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO yeah-baby.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 20:34:13 -0000
Received: from wasabisystems.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by yeah-baby.shagadelic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4E8FC1E0859; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:34:00 -0000
Subject: Re: [rfa?] Implement ppc32 SYSV {extract,store} return value
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F87176F.4050207@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1B04AB74-FB61-11D7-A35F-000A957650EC@wasabisystems.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2


On Friday, October 10, 2003, at 01:32  PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> The GCC shipped in 1.5 vs the one now in 1.6
> $ gcc --version
> 2.95.3

So, which one was right?  The 1.5 compiler or the 1.6 compiler?

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>