From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25428 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2009 08:23:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 25414 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jun 2009 08:23:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ugmailsc.ugent.be (HELO ugmailsc.ugent.be) (157.193.49.118) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:23:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ugmailsc.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E36E1CFFFB for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:23:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ugmailsc.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ugmailsc.ugent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btTIwWRYY80d for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:23:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cypress.ugent.be (cypress.ugent.be [157.193.71.48]) by ugmailsc.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A40A1CFFC9 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:23:12 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEALshJ0qdwc4w/2dsb2JhbADQJYQMBQ Received: from mail.elis.ugent.be ([157.193.206.48]) by relayrec.ugent.be with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2009 10:21:04 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elis.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4575918F18; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:21:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elis.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.elis.ugent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lEAhub2wfQUA; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:21:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ssh2.elis.UGent.be [157.193.206.127]) by mail.elis.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700FE918F12; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:21:00 +0200 (CEST) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Message-Id: <19C107AA-5271-4C23-A6D2-AFF75BBAC4E4@elis.ugent.be> From: Jonas Maebe To: Mark Kettenis In-Reply-To: <200904222215.n3MMF0p2006994@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:23:00 -0000 References: <7B6EF4DA-76C8-4D9C-8B9F-94153EF1C4E1@elis.ugent.be> <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> <200904222215.n3MMF0p2006994@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On 23 Apr 2009, at 00:15, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Jonas Maebe >> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:45:22 +0200 >> >> Ok, I can adapt my patch to clean that up. I'd prefer my i386 Borland >> fastcall patch to be committed first though, since changing this >> calling convention stuff would also affect that patch. Is that >> possible given my current in-progress state as far as the copyright >> assignment process is concerned? If so, Mark, could you tell me >> whether anything should still be changed in the last version I sent >> you? > > That last diff is ok with me, but Tom has a point here. The effect on > the i386-specific bits should be fairly minimal. > > The copyright assignment process needs to be dealt with before we move > forward though. It took quite a while, but I'm happy to say that my copyright assignment is now complete. I've received my confirmation mail from FSF that they received all necessary documents. Jonas