From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Kettenis To: gdb-patches@cygnus.com Subject: 4.17.85 Feedback Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 08:22:00 -0000 Message-id: <199903041622.RAA09527@landau.wins.uva.nl> X-SW-Source: 1999-03/msg00003.html I have tested the prerelease on the Hurd and encountered some small compilation problems. The first problem is caused by the following change: Thu Dec 31 16:54:30 1998 David Taylor * inferior.h (proc_wait): Declare. The Hurd already has a proc_wait RPC so the prototype in clashes with the one in "inferior.h". Both files need to be included in `gnu-nat.c' since it implements some of the functions in "inferior.h" by using functions provided by . Is there any chance that th above patch will be reverted? Of course it is possible to hack around the prototype clash, by writing #define proc_wait xxx_proc_wait #include #undef proc_wait but that's a bit ugly. Anyway if that's the way to go, I'll provide the patch, hust ask me. I'll send some patches to solve the other problems later today. Anyway, gdb 4.17.85 seems to work just as well as 4.17 did. Mark From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Kettenis To: gdb-patches@cygnus.com Subject: 4.17.85 Feedback Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <199903041622.RAA09527@landau.wins.uva.nl> X-SW-Source: 1999-q1/msg00057.html Message-ID: <19990401000000.Tr0X6oHJWRFb-43O5GR2lUqZhVt-3sbtB8C7ichCi9k@z> I have tested the prerelease on the Hurd and encountered some small compilation problems. The first problem is caused by the following change: Thu Dec 31 16:54:30 1998 David Taylor * inferior.h (proc_wait): Declare. The Hurd already has a proc_wait RPC so the prototype in clashes with the one in "inferior.h". Both files need to be included in `gnu-nat.c' since it implements some of the functions in "inferior.h" by using functions provided by . Is there any chance that th above patch will be reverted? Of course it is possible to hack around the prototype clash, by writing #define proc_wait xxx_proc_wait #include #undef proc_wait but that's a bit ugly. Anyway if that's the way to go, I'll provide the patch, hust ask me. I'll send some patches to solve the other problems later today. Anyway, gdb 4.17.85 seems to work just as well as 4.17 did. Mark