From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108223 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2016 22:36:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 90369 invoked by uid 89); 17 Nov 2016 22:36:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*freebsd.org, baldwin, Baldwin, sideways X-HELO: mail.baldwin.cx Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (HELO mail.baldwin.cx) (96.47.65.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:36:05 +0000 Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC85210A8CD; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:36:03 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Makefile improvements and cleanups Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1981603.HKe7bWK34L@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <0d34e13186bacb7e247d2c93e5688a06@polymtl.ca> References: <20161113034625.8237-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <29640938.kQM7iLB2ip@ralph.baldwin.cx> <0d34e13186bacb7e247d2c93e5688a06@polymtl.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00503.txt.bz2 On Thursday, November 17, 2016 02:20:41 PM Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2016-11-17 13:54, John Baldwin wrote: > > Are you still planning to push patch 4? I don't currently have any > > pending > > patches to the files you have renamed though I do have pending MIPS > > patches > > for FreeBSD which are new files (and if you are going to move forward > > with > > this I might as well rename them to use the new style of names now). > > Hi John, > > I am planning to refresh patches 3 and 4 and send a v2 soon. > > Just to get an idea, what is your opinion about this change? Thumbs > down, sideways or up? It's a patch that makes things marginally better, > but that has a big potential of conflicts for those who carry patches > (i.e. you), so I'd like to know what you think. I think it's fine to make things more uniform. The only inconvenience will be that if I fix bugs in existing files the patch I add to the existing FreeBSD port will have to be against the old file names until the next release of GDB, but that is a relatively minor one. I don't currently have any pending patches to any of the files you are renaming. -- John Baldwin