From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54903 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2016 03:04:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54842 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2016 03:04:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:7Bit X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:04:30 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E953A1; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hardin.shanghai.arm.com (unknown [10.164.2.103]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A0363F21A; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:04:28 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Preud'homme To: Pedro Alves Cc: Don Breazeal , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [pushed][PATCH] Fix '-data-read-memory-bytes' typo/assertion Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1932681.XBRLBq5QO1@hardin.shanghai.arm.com> User-Agent: KMail/5.0.2 (Linux/4.2.0-25-generic; KDE/5.15.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56B3D86A.8040901@redhat.com> References: <1447894382-1469-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> <56B3D69E.3030205@codesourcery.com> <56B3D86A.8040901@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:02:02 PM Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/04/2016 10:54 PM, Don Breazeal wrote: > > Pedro, you approved the original patch; OK to back-port this to the 7.10 > > branch? > > OK. Great! Many people build from stable branch rather than from tarball to get all the latest bugfixes. I know we do so as probably many others so a backport is definitely worthwhile I think. Thanks both of you. Best regards, Thomas