From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id CSTTL4hnBmJYWwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:41:28 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AEEBF1F3C8; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:41:28 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4C61EDF0 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:41:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E263858023 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:41:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0E263858023 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1644586887; bh=Avp6SGDsDHFcrsXamKYtIgpdplzNS6Vjjv2uzZuGIOY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=xDJCUVUpqx0dt8BbHqzmA5pQFijxiYWc4cRVQxROZIwHLb3okvpuWS0mNy8YoYa8B lhfM2ttDywCGExfmzyhAqSaiPqWq77dX72KftrJY5jwi2VUPusqJQRuFJKN1lmYq8d 6vtxUxyTqVOANAcRUINU2uwuKNpiHmZ6wdXXUPsQ= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A0C6385840E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:41:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8A0C6385840E Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 21BDetKg013269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:41:01 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 21BDetKg013269 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 124CF1EDF0; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:40:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19233af1-49ce-15c6-3a34-dc4e2048f9a7@polymtl.ca> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:40:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] gdb: Add basic support for LoongArch Content-Language: en-US To: Tiezhu Yang , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey , Andrew Burgess References: <20220120005011.4531-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> In-Reply-To: <20220120005011.4531-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:40:55 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2022-01-19 19:50, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > In November 2021, my workmate Zhensong Liu submitted a single gdb > patch [1] to support LoongArch which is a new RISC architecture, > thanks Zhensong for his great work. > > It seems that the patch is too big to review, a patch series would be > easier to review after internal discussion. > > This patchset only adds the minimal changes as simple as possible, the > basic command "run", "break", "continue", "next", "step" and "quit" can > be used to debug. > > This is the first step, we will submit other more patches step by step > in the future, these small patches make an easily understood change that > can be verified by reviewers, any comments will be much appreciated. There should probably be a new entry for LoongArch in gdb/MAINTAINERS. Simon