From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25696 invoked by alias); 5 May 2009 11:20:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 25686 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2009 11:20:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx.southnet.co.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2009 11:19:56 +0000 Received: from totara (166.26.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.26.166]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD8D3DA03D; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:19:52 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D47DC13C; Tue, 5 May 2009 23:19:51 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18944.8407.3217.33857@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 11:20:00 -0000 To: "Marc Khouzam" Cc: Subject: RE: [Patch] [MI] Out-of-scope varObjects no longer trigger a var-update change In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA076043E0@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA0759C401@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <18938.58435.813818.170271@totara.tehura.co.nz> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA075CB185@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <18940.53928.936676.982399@totara.tehura.co.nz> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA076043E0@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 > I tried to apply the patch below but it didn't fix my problem. > I believe that in my case, type_changed is 0 > and > install_new_value returns 0. > So, even with your patch, nothing gets pushed on the result > vector, no? Hmm, looks like you are right. It looks incomplete and I would have to revert changes to varobj_update_one in mi-cmd-var.c also. Perhaps your change is simplest after all. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob