From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6007 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2016 17:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5990 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2016 17:55:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:579 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:55:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E47DC0567B3; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u79HtHPg006954; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:55:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5]: Enhancements to "flags": i386 cleanup To: Doug Evans References: <047d7b5dbb865204bd052cf0bc2b@google.com> <2026a39c-0b53-9142-74ce-091bc73832d8@redhat.com> <7635a6d6-4059-6b23-952c-a88dbfef3b18@redhat.com> Cc: gdb-patches , Wei-cheng Wang From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <187cd5cc-be8d-3a61-66cd-338ea68a72f8@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 On 08/08/2016 09:33 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. > Sorry for the trouble. > > I think(!) these two patches fix things. > Basically, I made "end" required again, and made single bit fields > default to bool, > and then tweaked a couple of xml files to minimize changes. > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-08/msg00105.html > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-08/msg00106.html > > It occurs to me I need to update the docs too. > Additional patch to follow. Thanks! All looks good to me. -- Pedro Alves