From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18550 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2003 14:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18543 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 14:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 14:52:54 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-204-110.inter.net.il [80.230.204.110]) by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id AOW02754; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:52:43 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:52:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <1858-Fri24Oct2003164656+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200310240123.h9O1N3iw010450@duracef.shout.net> (message from Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:23:03 -0400) Subject: Re: [doco/threads] document internal thread signals on gnu/linux Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200310240123.h9O1N3iw010450@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:23:03 -0400 > From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain > > I'm looking for two kinds of comments: (1) is the content okay, > and (2) is the formatting okay. The Texinfo markup is okay, but it sounds like the text will need to be rewritten. Also, please think what index entries would you, as a user who bumped into this problem, look for, and perhaps add more @cindex entries. The hardest thing with this kind of factoids is not to bury them in the manual where no reasonable user will ever find them. Good indexing can alleviate this problem. Thanks.