From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16509 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2008 04:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 16501 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2008 04:38:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:38:13 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (199.31.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.31.199]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784F73D9FB4; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:38:10 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 244EF8FC6D; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:38:01 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18521.58024.181940.616509@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:07:00 -0000 To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [non-stop] 00/10 non-stop mode In-Reply-To: <200806190457.59551.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <200806152357.52177.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200806182208.35175.pedro@codesourcery.com> <18521.35420.126987.238633@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200806190457.59551.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.50.2 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 > Selecting non-stop or all-stop modes, is something the user will > want to do (even if all-stop mode gets to be implemented on top of > non-stop in the future), as both modes are useful. If non-stop is available, under what circumstance would someone choose to use all-stop? -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob