From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1421 invoked by alias); 21 May 2008 03:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 1413 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2008 03:55:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 03:54:51 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (141.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.141]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1288E3D9CE7; Wed, 21 May 2008 15:54:44 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46C818FC6D; Wed, 21 May 2008 15:54:40 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18483.40191.440902.286889@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:11:00 -0000 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] New annotation for threads In-Reply-To: <20080521033025.GB4080@adacore.com> References: <18458.21177.959458.278174@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501233703.GF3801@adacore.com> <18458.23326.25887.70597@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18478.48682.13900.951343@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18479.62120.536436.427524@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080520035226.GA4669@adacore.com> <20080520182401.GA3895@adacore.com> <20080521033025.GB4080@adacore.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.50.2 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00625.txt.bz2 > Traditionally, we have followed the advice of the GNU Coding standards > and not used the empty line when the changes were inter-related. and > But I think that asking someone to follow this rule is reasonable given > the little amount of extra work that it requires. I would also suggest > that emacs be fixed to follow the GCS. Presumably that would require Emacs to judge whether changes were related or not. THat would be a nice feature! -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob