Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file not to print address truncated

[Adam Nemet <anemet@caviumnetworks.com>]

Pedro Alves writes:
> Ah, that looks like paddress then, except for the width.

Right, I missed that.  Thanks.  I really don't care about width except that
that was what allowed me to reuse this function.

I can retest the patch without those bits then (which is pretty much an
obvious patch now) like:

	* symfile.c (add_symbol_file_command): Use paddress rather than
	hex_string to print the address.

Index: symfile.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.c,v
retrieving revision 1.199
diff -F^\([(a-zA-Z0-9_]\|#define\) -u -p -u -r1.199 symfile.c
--- symfile.c	21 Apr 2008 14:25:16 -0000	1.199
+++ symfile.c	4 May 2008 00:11:11 -0000
@@ -2239,8 +2239,7 @@ add_symbol_file_command (char *args, int
          entered on the command line. */
       section_addrs->other[sec_num].name = sec;
       section_addrs->other[sec_num].addr = addr;
-      printf_unfiltered ("\t%s_addr = %s\n",
-		       sec, hex_string ((unsigned long)addr));
+      printf_unfiltered ("\t%s_addr = %s\n", sec, paddress (addr));
       sec_num++;
 
       /* The object's sections are initialized when a