Re: [PATCH, gdb6.8] -break-list doesn't list multiple breakpoints

Nick Roberts
2008-04-02T23:51:26Z

Bogdan Slusarczyk writes:
> Hi everyone, I wrote my own patch for -break-list. I'm not sure that it
> meets all requirements mentioned in
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00251.html and previous
> discussions, but combination -break-list + multiple breakpoints is now
> usable for me. I'm not familiar with gdb test suit, so it's NOT tested
> at all (except few my own cases).
>
> What does it do? Until now -break-list returned:
> ...
>
> After my changes it returns additional list named 'locations' instead of
> second 'addr' field:

I don't think the second 'addr' field should be there, but I'm not sure that I
really like this 'locations' field. 4.1, 4.2 etc are breakpoints and so I
think they should be identified as such (using the bkptno field).

Notice that you can set them individually:

-break-insert *0x6f14137f
-break-insert *0x0442137f

I also think that

info break 4.1

and

-break-info 4.1

should just list that breakpoint. With your patch it doesn't.

--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob