From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25965 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 01:57:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 25921 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2008 01:57:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:56:49 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (192.31.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.31.192]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FA13DA384; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:56:42 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B20808FC6D; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:56:39 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18335.55636.550226.474666@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:04:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [BUG:MI] -break-list doesn't list multiple breakpoints In-Reply-To: <20080129231645.GC21147@caradoc.them.org> References: <18310.38708.144719.374963@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18311.57557.312425.107700@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080111225452.GA26085@caradoc.them.org> <18314.33230.101539.472963@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080129185942.GA9019@caradoc.them.org> <18335.44497.199685.970311@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080129231645.GC21147@caradoc.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.0.60.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2 > > It's a backwards incompatible change but do other frontends use it? > > Yes; I checked Eclipse before I wrote back. That's odd because ISTR that Eclipse has a console. What happens if you create a breakpoint from the command line? Perhaps Marc can comment. Also isn't DSF meant to replace the debugger frontend that is currently part of Eclipse CDT? > > As an alternative, I guess this line alone could be removed so that > > -break-insert lists the multiple breakpoint locations being set and the > > adjust MI documentation to explain this. > > We should check what the new MI output looks like, and see if it > breaks Emacs / Eclipse / Kdevelop. It might be that easy. It won't break Emacs becuase it doesn't use the output of -break-insert. It still needs the line: && !ui_out_is_mi_like_p (uiout)) to be removed. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob