From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10626 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2008 08:22:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 10617 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2008 08:22:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:22:14 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (159.61.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.61.159]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC0C3DA803; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:22:11 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3BEC28FC6D; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:22:08 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18333.37039.300077.898126@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:29:00 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Make mi_cmd_break_insert exception-safe. In-Reply-To: <200801280718.23464.vladimir@codesourcery.com> References: <200801271715.08542.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <18332.62269.25839.287045@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200801280718.23464.vladimir@codesourcery.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.0.60.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00640.txt.bz2 > > > [gdb] > > > * breakpoint.c (break_command_1): Return void. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > That's a contradiction in terms, isn't it? > > Not sure. C++ allows > > return ; > > I suspect modern C allows as well, so terminologically, > this is fine. Yeah, a bit like a negative increase maybe. Anyway in your patch break_command_1 doesn't return anything, void or otherwise. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob