From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26344 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2008 04:13:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 26335 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2008 04:13:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:13:21 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (121.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.121]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2323D9AF8; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:13:18 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 15D318FC6D; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:13:16 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18329.25051.770437.318849@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:24:00 -0000 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] document "set/show multiple-choice-auto-select" In-Reply-To: <20080125025017.GG3979@adacore.com> References: <20080124213256.GA5796@adacore.com> <18329.4090.323528.699595@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080125025017.GG3979@adacore.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.0.50.36 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2 > > I would guess that your proposed patch will overlap with one that I've > > recently submitted: > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00421.html > > I'm sorry - I am still jetlaged from my 36h trip and 12h time difference, > so I may be even more obtuse than usual ;-). IIUC, you are trying to > improve the situation in MI regarding multiple-location breakpoints, > right? Where is the overlapping? In the fact that you'll have to > modify the documentation in the same area? You'll have to forgive me, > I don't know the MI protocol apart from the general principles behind > it. This may also explain my questions... The thread I refer to is about breakpoint menus and it follows (after some delay) a bug report by Dodji Seketeli (nemiver). Vladimir Prus has suggested that we fix this in another way but I just thought I'd draw your attention to it. You don't need to know much about MI. It just accepts all the overloaded breakpoints when MI is the underlying interpreter. Perhaps I should have pointed here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-01/msg00104.html -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob