From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ob] unbreak MI
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18251.47321.156923.358334@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <figchq$kkt$1@ger.gmane.org>
> > Generally, with a NULL pointer, or and address that can't be dereferenced,
> > MI prints out the value field as value="".
> >
> > What is the problem in this case? Why isn't the right fix to add a
> > check_typedef somewhere?
>
> check_typedef? The original problem was that check_typedef was getting
> called on NULL pointer, so adding more check_typedef calls won't help.
> Probably:
>
> if (!gdb_type)
> ui_out_field_string (uiout, "value", "");
> else if (mi_print_value_p (gdb_type, print_values))
> ui_out_field_string (uiout, "value", varobj_get_value (var));
>
> is the right logic?
It's probably the right logic, but it seems to cure the symptom rather than the
cause. What I mean't, I guess, was where/how does check_typedef is get passed
a NULL pointer? And can't that call be conditioned (i.e. "add a *check* to
check_typedef") , e.g., something like:
if (!gdb_type)
check_typedef (gdb_type)
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-31 18:45 Vladimir Prus
2007-11-27 3:08 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-27 6:17 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-27 6:28 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2007-11-27 7:00 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-27 10:33 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-27 10:45 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-27 11:08 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-27 20:47 ` Michael Snyder
2007-11-27 21:05 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-27 23:13 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-27 13:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-27 23:11 ` Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18251.47321.156923.358334@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox