From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 38853 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2020 14:16:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 38838 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2020 14:16:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:840 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:16:42 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B28C51E47D; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:16:40 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for DWARF5 location lists entries From: Simon Marchi To: "Achra, Nitika" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Cc: Ali Tamur , "George, Jini Susan" References: <48103fb5-d3ee-0ae0-92a7-f1c02debd449@simark.ca> <0d36089b-1890-c579-7715-641e94dd4bb6@simark.ca> <27bfa975-e28d-eafb-d9db-f0d2be5f5bde@simark.ca> <63fd3ce4-810b-d231-f238-85fe6d2dbb1f@simark.ca> <726ebd81-48b2-684d-d4b5-8cdcf315d737@simark.ca> Message-ID: <18248e15-f646-1d3a-c95a-f6f69d8cc2ba@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <726ebd81-48b2-684d-d4b5-8cdcf315d737@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 On 2020-01-16 9:15 a.m., Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2020-01-16 6:29 a.m., Achra, Nitika wrote: >> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> Please find the attachment. >> >> >> *Handle DW_LLE_base_addressx, DW_LLE_startx_length and DW_LLE_start_length. >> >> Tested by running the testsuite before and after the patch and there is no increase in the number of test cases that fails. >> Tested with both -gdwarf-4 and -gdwarf-5 flags. Also tested -gslit-dwarf along with -gdwarf-4 as well as -gdwarf5 flags. >> >> >> gdb/ChangeLog: >> *dwarf2loc.c (decode_debug_loclists_addresses): Handle >> DW_LLE_base_addressx, DW_LLE_startx_length, DW_LLE_start_length. >> >> This is an effort to support DWARF5 in gdb. > > Hi Achra, Err sorry, I meant "Hi Nitika"!