From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Report stop locations in inlined functions.
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17ac2bdc-cd7b-d8f1-bf75-056fe87ca916@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bfba041-22f5-1650-1f83-0f8860f202fb@redhat.com>
On 07/18/2017 06:16 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 03:36 AM, Keith Seitz wrote:
>> I don't quite like this, though. This solution involves calling
>> decode_line_full, and that is really expensive, so I would be grateful if
>> maintaienrs could offer advice on how to better tackle this.
>
> I'm still trying to grok these patches fully, but, shouldn't comparing
> the breakpoint's bp_location's addresses work the same? I.e., with this,
> gdb.opt/inline-break.exp still passes cleanly here:
>
Hmm, and with this direction, we may not even need the
breakpoint_for_stop function. The location(s) that caused
the stop is/are in the bpstat chain:
stop_chain->bp_location_at->address
etc. Using those also implicitly makes sure that you're only
consulting locations that were inserted/enabled, as other
not-enabled/inserted locations won't appear in the bpstat chain.
Maybe we need to move this bit in infrun.c:
/* See if there is a breakpoint/watchpoint/catchpoint/etc. that
handles this event. */
ecs->event_thread->control.stop_bpstat
= bpstat_stop_status (get_regcache_aspace (get_current_regcache ()),
stop_pc, ecs->ptid, &ecs->ws, stop_chain);
a bit above, before the skip_inline_frames call, and then
you don't even need to pass down the bpstat to skip_inline_frames,
as you can then access it from the thread directly?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 2:36 [PATCH 1/2] Report call site for " Keith Seitz
2017-07-11 2:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] Report stop locations in " Keith Seitz
2017-07-18 17:16 ` Pedro Alves
2017-07-18 17:46 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-10-20 19:21 ` Keith Seitz
2017-10-27 12:37 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-30 21:18 ` Keith Seitz
2017-12-01 19:50 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-20 19:02 ` Keith Seitz
2017-07-11 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] Report call site for " Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-17 19:23 ` Jan Kratochvil
2017-07-18 19:05 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-20 18:46 ` Keith Seitz
2017-10-27 12:49 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17ac2bdc-cd7b-d8f1-bf75-056fe87ca916@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox