Re: [RFC] -thread-info new command

Nick Roberts
2007-03-20T03:26:21Z

> > It looks like I've misremembered, as the patch I've quoted is for
> > mi_cmd_break_insert and not gdb_thread_select. However, perhaps we should
> > still resolve the issue first.
>
> Yes, I agree. Is that the latest patch posted, if you know offhand?

I had thought it was, but no. You replied with:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00185.html:

It seems pretty clear to me that the patch which switched things to
return the result of catch_exceptions_with_msg was wrong. The
functions are defined to return an enum gdb_rc. Can't we make
them do that again? Simple, obviously correct.

but I could only come up with:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00208.html

which didn't seem that simple and is probably not correct