From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31341 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2007 22:30:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 31274 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2007 22:30:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:29:56 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (unknown [123.255.62.204]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE493D8245; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:29:53 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 66FF14F711; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:29:51 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17837.20958.59107.439086@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:30:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI: new timing command In-Reply-To: References: <17814.10139.269708.848818@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17814.58031.865155.682869@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061231042547.GA3236@nevyn.them.org> <17815.18190.987950.612053@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061231054946.GA4873@nevyn.them.org> <17815.27092.497145.908734@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061231151527.GC16449@nevyn.them.org> <200612311524.kBVFObud010411@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200612311609.kBVG9Fgh022431@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <17816.34925.514170.51734@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17817.34304.221915.628057@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17836.26941.915573.399839@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.10 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2 > > Any progress? > > Not yet, sorry. I hoped to get it done this past weekend, but, as you > could read on gdb@, ended up wasting most of it on setting up the test > suite (which I need to test your patch anyway). Hopefully, this > weekend I will finally get to your patch. I haven't written a test for this patch (yet ;-)). I just thought that you would run GDB with the patch, enable timing and look at the output of a few MI commands. I could force it to use get_run_time by changing the header files but that might not be as convincing. But there really is no urgency, enjoy your weekend first. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob