From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2193 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2007 22:18:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2185 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2007 22:18:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:18:20 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-124-45.snap.net.nz [202.124.124.45]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591463D8343; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:18:17 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0B6E74F6DF; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:18:13 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17828.5284.347590.450036@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:18:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI testsuite failures [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <20070109142623.GA17931@nevyn.them.org> References: <17825.33653.885121.321357@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17825.56391.466504.569955@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070108171149.GC15412@nevyn.them.org> <17826.50865.340113.767106@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070108224526.GA28903@nevyn.them.org> <17826.54122.891164.154788@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070109142623.GA17931@nevyn.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 > > Great. Now how about getting rid of the mi2-*.exp tests? This will halve > > the work to add a field to -var-update. The current level *is* mi2 and > > when we move to mi3 we can call the mi-*.exp tests mi2-*.exp and create > > new tests for mi3. I think Andrew possibly jumped the gun by `adding' > > mi3. > > Haven't we discussed this on the list before, repeatedly? I can only recall discussing it once before, in June 2005, a year and a half ago. > So far we've > left them in place. That's why I've raised it again. There are still no features unique to mi3 and I thought perhaps that enough time has elapsed to reconsider it. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob