From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8946 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2007 19:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 8938 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2007 19:43:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:43:21 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-120-54.snap.net.nz [202.124.120.54]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7683D836B; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:43:17 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id C20D74F6AE; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:43:15 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17821.22736.226297.252279@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:43:00 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: Another -var-update bug? [PATCH] In-Reply-To: References: <17790.36044.454650.114329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17817.34669.993434.397044@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 > Had I immediately knew that this patch will break something, I'd say so. > But in practice, while I'm sure KDevelop won't care, I was not able to > make definite statement about Eclipse without looking at the code, and > I had no time for such look back then. > > Given that this is already checked in, I'll let you know if I find any > problems with Eclipse. Generally, now that the release has been made, once it is agreed that a patch is likely to do the right thing, I'd like see it checked in. That way its likely to get more testing while the next release is almost six months away. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob