From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1500 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2007 22:13:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 1490 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jan 2007 22:13:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:13:06 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-124-112.snap.net.nz [202.124.124.112]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F893D83C6; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:13:03 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id AA2E54F6E8; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:13:02 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17817.34669.993434.397044@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:13:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: Another -var-update bug? [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <20070101162437.GA13674@nevyn.them.org> References: <17790.36044.454650.114329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17791.40309.90872.126841@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061230150650.GB15107@nevyn.them.org> <17814.60022.564828.19567@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061231021947.GA719@nevyn.them.org> <20070101162437.GA13674@nevyn.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 > > Good, that's not bad at all. If Vlad doesn't think this is likely to > > break kdevelop or Eclipse, the patch is OK. > > So, given that, why did you commit it? Maybe Vlad agreed with the > patch in another thread that I didn't read? He was part of the original thread and had posted messages subsequent to yours. I presumed that if he thought it would break anything he would have said so. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob