From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23925 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2006 23:05:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 23914 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Dec 2006 23:05:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:05:38 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-125-62.snap.net.nz [202.124.125.62]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67BB3D81D2; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:05:35 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id EA4BABE447; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:00:58 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17814.61351.134259.72877@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:05:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: variable objects and registers In-Reply-To: <20061230205032.GE25539@nevyn.them.org> References: <17782.41205.881283.845357@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17801.58248.297377.752117@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061230202601.GA25539@nevyn.them.org> <200612302340.22697.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20061230205032.GE25539@nevyn.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.3 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 > Yes, BLOCK_START and BLOCK_END are currently the right way to check > if an address is in a block. Yes, I think this is how it would. Let's come up with an implementation first and then you can try shoot it down. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob