From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8695 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2006 04:45:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 8685 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2006 04:45:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 04:45:29 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-124-80.snap.net.nz [202.124.124.80]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9AF3D823D; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:46:23 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 62D05BE3D2; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:41:05 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17779.42719.879365.463927@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 04:45:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] Doc: -var-delete In-Reply-To: References: <17779.39827.835325.436366@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.91.10 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 > Not that I object to the change, but I'm curious: why did you think it > was obvious? I guess if it really was obvious then someone would have made the change before me but I was trying to apply the definition in MAINTAINERS: An "obvious fix" means that there is no possibility that anyone will disagree with the change. As I'm documenting existing (undocumented) functionality I can't see how anyone can disagree. You might be able to improve upon it, but that's presumably a different point and you are still able to do so. Why do you think it is not obvious? -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob