From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3443 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2006 21:05:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 3427 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2006 21:05:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:05:12 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p283-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.111.29]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EE976BDA7; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:05:11 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id ABF3C1D3550; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:04:18 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17552.31184.975862.692460@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:05:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI Doco In-Reply-To: References: <17535.33986.598009.914783@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17536.4472.263731.425097@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17538.8607.697546.427486@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17546.915.125070.943811@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.15381.217912.425365@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.60705.62123.543072@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17548.36381.999594.50258@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17549.1830.40223.127804@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060613044551.030C51D3550@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17551.10938.599796.89658@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.21 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 > > No, but I have a clear idea about what you have approved and what you may > > not have seen. You could choose to trust me. > > If I somehow sounded like I didn't trust you, I apologize: I never > meant anything like that. Of course I trust you; I just need to see > the parts I didn't yet review. No, I mean as a tactic i.e trust my ability to DTRT, rather than my integrity. Documentation on mainline is much less of a risk than code on the branch. >... > > Clearly they're in msg00117.html, more specifically everything after and > > including "@subsubheading A Bad Command". > > That was the clue I was missing. So everything after this > @subsubheading is the stuff I should review, right? I will do that > soon. That's right. Please remember though, the patch that I want to actually commit will look quite different, because I also want to re-order the nodes. Thanks. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob